Course Modules -- Interior Design Course Modules -- Facility Management
Green/Sustainable Design Instructional Handbook IFMA CEU Programs
IIDA Green Track Metropolis Educational Outreach
Teaching Green Links

Home
Green/Sustainable Interiors
Resource Links
Educational Materials
Site Map
Sponsors:
BASF logo and link
Interface logo and link
Knoll logo and link
C&A logo and link
Green Design Education Initiative logo

Ecology and the Built Environment
  1. Developed by Helena Moussatche, Ph.D., University of Florida

  2. Course Objectives:

    The primary objective of this course is to foster knowledge and understanding of building technology systems that support people’s activities and well-being in relation to the natural environment. The specific goals are the following:

    1. To establish the basic concept of buildings as life-support systems and a global perspective of design.

    2. To develop a vocabulary of technical terms related to environmental systems and sustainable design.

    3. To develop understanding of:
      1. traditional and advancing building technology systems as they are affected and impact design solutions.
      2. the possible impacts of building technology systems on people’s health and safety as well as on the sustainability of the global environment.
      3. the role of interior designers in ensuring global environmental sustainability

    4. To provide opportunities for further development of communication and teamwork skills, and environmental stewardship.

  3. Type of course in which project or unit is used:

    “Environmental Technology for Interiors” is a lecture and discussion course and is part of a series of building technology courses. The teaching approach for this course encourages independence, self-teaching, critical thinking, and cooperative learning. Students are expected to demonstrate their ability to recall facts, understand ideas, analyze, synthesize, and evaluate information. Part of the information is presented through lectures, field trips, and assigned readings, and part is gathered, explored, evaluated and organized by students, individually and in teams. Throughout the semester, students are encouraged to practice oral, reading and writing skills, drafting, modeling and imaging in a variety of assignments.


  4. Prerequisite information:

    This course is offered in the Fall semester of the third year and requires three Architectural Design Studios, Introduction to Architectural Interiors (studio), History of Interiors I & II, Graphic Communications, Interior Materials, Theory of Interior Design, Computer/3D Design, and Physics as pre-requisites for enrollment.

  5. Content covered in lecture or discussion:

    The course covers traditional and advancing building technology systems linked to interior design. Students learn about functional and environmental aspects of building technology systems as they relate with people’s well-being, indoor environmental quality, and global sustainability. Students also examine the role of interior designers in improving the quality of the global environment.

    1. The specific topics addressed are: [see Lecture Outlines]
      Traditional and current notions of Shelter; Natural and Human-built Environment; Global Sustainability; Indoor Environmental Quality; Human Comfort; Ecological and Benign Design.

    2. Natural systems: solar patterns, climate, radon, electro-magnetic fields, living organisms, ecology, and human body functions.

    3. Building Technology Systems: day lighting; concepts of thermodynamics; thermal control; humidity control; natural and mechanical ventilation; air conditioning and purification; sanitation; waste removal; water and power distribution; alternative energy sources; acoustics; fire and life safety; transportation; security; and telecommunication.

    4. General information on building systems: history; characteristics and properties of different types of systems; regional climatic and cultural differences related to the use of building technologies; chemical and microbial contamination; use of natural resources; manufacturing process; testing, installation procedures and spatial requirements; related research findings and conflicting evaluations; environmental and safety concerns.

    5. Laws, codes, regulations, standards, and practices that protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public.

  6. Length of course, units and projects:

    The course is structured for one semester or 16 weeks. Students attend three hours of classes per week, distributed in two days. Every four weeks the one-hour lecture class is used for guidance on projects or for evaluations.

    Out of class time to complete the coursework varies from 3 to 6 hours per week depending on the type or phase of the assignment. Students are also required to participate in at least three field trips. These take about an hour to prepare and the time spent in the site visit depends on the location. In most cases, it takes one morning or afternoon (3 to 4 hours) per visit. The instructor only accompanies students in one of the field trips. Each project requires 6-8 hours of teamwork.

    The course content is divided into 15 units, each taking approximately one week—
    Week 1: Environment and Life-support systems.
    Week 2: Solar patterns, Design and Climate
    Week 3: Day lighting
    Week 4: Temperature and Humidity
    Week 5: Ventilation
    Week 6: Cooling
    Week 7: Heating
    Week 8: Benign Design
    Week 9: Indoor Air Quality and Air Purification
    Week 10: Water and Waste
    Week 11: Power and Energy
    Week 12: Fire and Life Safety
    Week 13: Acoustics and electronic sound systems
    Week 14: Security and Telecommunication
    Week 15: Conveying Systems

    Each unit encompasses specific readings and activities that take an average of six hours per week to prepare and grade.

  7. Course assignments:

    Students are expected to actively participate in class activities, work individually, within groups, and with the instructor. Throughout the semester, students are required to individually write an average of four reaction papers consisting of 1 to 3 pages each and take four quizzes. In addition, two team projects provide an opportunity for further development of students’ communication skills.

    The reading of provided texts is fundamental to achieve the necessary understanding of the addressed subjects. The reaction papers provide a base for class discussions and help the instructor in identifying common misconceptions. Students are encouraged to write their reaction papers by answering the following questions:

    1. Had you thought about these issues before?
    2. Where do you agree and disagree with this author’s view?
    3. Do you think professional designers should use this background in their work? Why and why not? Do you have evidence that they are using it?
    4. What sort of design would result if using these concepts or not?
    5. In what way you believe this information will affect your work or life?

    Each quiz covers the specific information of the previous four content units. Quizzes consist of a set of objective questions that evaluate individual learning of FIDER required topics and serve as a preparation for future NCIDQ certification. Quiz questions are always based on class notes provided for every lecture and posted in the class website. [see Quiz Sample]

    Team project I examines a series of case studies on sustainable design applications of environmental technologies. Teams prepare a Power Point presentation [see exemplars: Project 1] and orally present a case study that exemplifies innovative use of technology systems to the class. Each presentation takes about 15 minutes followed by a class discussion and a lecture. Teams are expected to formulate questions for the class and to lead the discussion. Teams consist of 3 to 4 students each.

    Team project II is a final paper/report consisting of at least 15 pages and is due at the end of the semester. Teams develop the report comparing all systems used for thermal comfort, water and energy conservation, and waster reduction in three different approaches of residential design - Solar, Energy Star, and Conventional. The project is based on three specific field trips:

    1. On the first field trip, the class is accompanied by the instructor and visits a Solar House located at Interlachen, FL. The owner is a Physics professor at the University of Florida who built the house and can explain to students every feature that makes this unique house self-sustained and independent from the utilities grid. Students are encouraged to visit the Solar House web site [http://www.phys.ufl.edu/~liz/home.html] before the visit and prepare questions to ask during the visit. They are expected to sketch and take pictures, interview the owner about the alternative environmental technologies observed, and the family’s life-style and believes.

    2. The second and third field trips are a teams’ choice of both one conventional residence and an “Energy Star” model home located in new developments under construction in town or in the vicinities. The teams visit the model homes, take pictures, and do interviews with real state agents and/or builders to learn about the energy saving building technologies (passive and active) and materials specified.

    Observation, questioning, and photography of these buildings allow the examination, comparison, and evaluation of several environmental technology systems and their design implications. The final paper synthesizes field observations and obtained information, comparing the use of alternative and conventional environmental technologies, and materials in the three different types of residential design. Students are encouraged to build an argument with their own comments justifying their judgments with evidence found in complementary literature and in the field observations. [see exemplars: Project 2]

  8. Reading Assignments:

    REQUIRED BOOKS

    Binggelli, C. (2003) Building Systems For Interior Designers. New York, NY: John Wiley.

    Harmon, S. K. (2001) The Codes Guidebook for Interiors. New York, NY: John Wiley.

    ARTICLES

    Baggs, S. & Baggs, J. (1996). Choosing a healthy location. The healthy house (pp. 26-43).Sydney, Australia: Harper Collins.

    Goodland, R. (1976). Buildings: environmental bonds or barriers? An ecological perspective. In: Robert Goodland (Ed.) Buildings and the environment (pp. 186-196). Millbrook, NY: The Cary Arboretum of the NY Botanical Garden.

    Guzowski, M. (2000). Daylighting for sustainable design. (Introduction; Chapter 1. pp. xxiii – 76).New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

    Hawkes, D., McDonald, J., Steemers, K. (1995, May). Design for differing climates. The Architects’ Journal. pp. 35-37.

    McDonough, W. & Braungart, M. (1998, October). The next industrial revolution. The Atlantic Monthly.

    Pander, G. (2001, June). What if green design were just good design? Dwell, pp. 86-87.

    Pilatowicz, G. (1995). Part I: Environmental issue. Eco-interiors (pp. 9-31). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

    Snoonian, P.E. & Gould K. L. (2001, June) Architecture rediscovers being green. Architectural Record, pp. 87-96.

    Building-integrated photovoltaics: Putting power production where it belongs. (2001, March). Environmental Building News, 10; (3). pp. 1, 8-14.

    Building green… quietly: Noise pollution and what to do about it. (2001, January). Environmental Building News, 10 (1). pp. 1, 9-14.

    Daylighting: Energy and productivity benefits. (1999, September). Environmental Building News, 8 (9). pp. , 10-13.

    Daylighting – part 2: Bringing daylight deeper into buildings. (1999, October). Environmental Building News,. 8 (10). pp. 1, 10-14.

    Energy Star programs: Uncle Sam’s partnership for energy efficiency. (1998, June). Environmental Building News, 7 (6). pp. 1, 10-15.

    Is solar still active? Water heating and other solar thermal applications. (1999, July/August). Environmental Building News, 8 (7/8). pp. 1, 10-17.

    Keeping pollutants out: Entryway design for green buildings. (2001, October). Environmental Building News, 10 (10). pp. 1, 11-14.

    Mold in buildings: What it is and how to keep it out. (2001, June). Environmental Building News, 10.(6). pp. 1, 9-14.

    Radiant-floor heating: when it does – and doesn’t – make sense. (2002, January). Environmental Building News, 11 (1). pp. 1, 9-14.

    Radon & other soil gases: Dealing with the hazards from below. (1998, July/August). Environmental Building News, 7 (7). pp. 1, 8-14.

    Sustainability and building codes. (2001. September). Environmental Building News, 10 (9). pp. 1, 8-15.

    Thermal mass & R-value: Making sense of a confusing issue. (1998, April). Environmental Building News, 7 (4). pp. 1, 12-14.

    Students are strongly recommended to subscribe to one of the professional journals such as Interiors and Sources, Dwell, and Environmental Building News. Special articles are found in these periodicals and serve well in supplementing information of a current nature

  9. Resources Needed:

    1. Computer with Internet, Photoshop and Power Point capabilities.

    2. Access to a technical library.

    3. Ability to participate in field trips.

    4. VCR

    5. Videos:
      1. What’s happening with the weather? (2000) South Burlington, VT: WBBH Boston Video.
      2. “Environsense” (1993) Kennesaw, GA: Environsense Consortium, Inc.
      3. “Controlling Indoor Moisture” (Date n/a) www.oikos.com
      4. “Design & Installation Guidelines for Non-Heat Recovery Whole House Ventilation” (Date n/a) www.oikos.com

  10. Evaluation Criteria:

    Grades are based on assignments as well as on class participation. The following areas are measured and evaluated:

    1. Understanding of concepts and content information.

    2. Demonstration of critical thinking, creativity, and organization skills.

    3. Demonstration of effective use of graphic, written and oral communication skills.

    4. Demonstration of attendance and active participation in class, team assignments, and field trips.

    Projects and reaction papers are graded based on form and content: relevance of the information gathered, organization of the material, visual and/or verbal communication, demonstration of critical thinking and creativity.

    GRADING

    Attendance and participation in class discussions: 10%
    Participation in Field Trips: 10%
    Reaction papers (individual): 15%
    Case Study Presentation (team): 15%
    Quizzes (individual): 20%
    Final paper/report (team): 30%

  11. Exemplars of student outcomes: [click to see examples of student work]

  12. Bibliography:

    AIA (1998) Environmental resource guide.

    Allen, E. (1995) How buildings work. New York: Oxford University Press

    Baggs, S. & Baggs, J. (1996) The healthy house. Sydney, Australia: Harper Collins.

    Ballast, D. K. (2002) Interior design reference manual: A guide to the NCIDQ exam. Belmont, CA: Professional Publications.

    Ballast, D. K. (1998) Interior construction & detailing for designers and architects. Belmont, CA: Professional Publications.

    Barnett, D. L. & Browning, W. D. (1995) A primer on sustainable building. Snowmass, CO: Rocky Mountain Institute.

    Berleant, A. (1992) The aesthetics of the environment. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Bower, J. (1993) Healthy house building: A design & construction guide. Unionville, IN: The Healthy House Institute.

    Brown, D. E. et al. (2000) Sustainable architecture white papers. New York, NY: Earth Pledge Foundation.

    Chiras, D. (2000) The natural house: A ccmplete guide to healthy, energy-efficient, environmental homes. Vermont: Chelsea Green

    Cowan, S. & Van Der Ryn, S. (1996) Ecological design. Washington, DC: Island Press

    Crowter, R. L. (1992) Ecologic architecture. Stoneham, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Drummond, W. et al. (1999) Life cycle costing guidelines for materials and building systems for Florida’s public educational facilities. vol. 1 & 2. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Department of Education.

    Environmental Building News (periodical)

    Flynn, J. E. & Segil, A. W. (1970) Architectural interior systems: lighting, air conditioning, acoustics. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Harmon, S. K. (2001) The codes guidebook for interiors. New York, NY: John Wiley.

    Harte, J. et al. (1991) Toxics a to z: A guide to everyday pollution hazards. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Kempton, W.; Boster, J. S. & Hartley, J. A. (1995) Environmental values in american culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Lechner, N. (2001) Heating, cooling, lighting: design methods for architects. New York, NY: John Wiley.

    Mendler, S. & Odell, W. The HOK guidebook for sustainable design. New York, NY: John Wiley.

    Pearson, D. (1989) The natural house book. New York: Gaia Books.

    Pilatowicz, G. (1995) Eco-interiors. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

    Rousseau, D. & Wasley, J. (1997) Healthy by design. Vancouver: Harley & Marks.

    Rousseau, D.; Rea, W.J. & Enwright, J. (1988) Your home, your health, & well-being. Berkeley: Ten Speed Press

    Rousseau, D. & Wasley, J. (1997) Healthy by design. Vancouver: Harley & Marks.
    SBCCI - Standard building code (latest edition)

    Tao, W. K. Y. & Janis, R. R. (2001) Mechanical and electrical systems in buildings. Upper-Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Wells, M. (1981) Gentle architecture. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

    Wilson, E. O. (1984) Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press


IDEC logo and link IFMA logo and link IIDA logo and link Metropolis magazine logo and link