|
- Developed
by Helena Moussatche, Ph.D., University of Florida
- Course
Objectives:
The primary
objective of this course is to foster knowledge and understanding
of building technology systems that support peoples activities
and well-being in relation to the natural environment. The specific
goals are the following:
- To
establish the basic concept of buildings as life-support systems
and a global perspective of design.
- To
develop a vocabulary of technical terms related to environmental
systems and sustainable design.
- To
develop understanding of:
- traditional
and advancing building technology systems as they are affected
and impact design solutions.
- the
possible impacts of building technology systems on peoples
health and safety as well as on the sustainability of the global
environment.
- the
role of interior designers in ensuring global environmental
sustainability
- To
provide opportunities for further development of communication and
teamwork skills, and environmental stewardship.
- Type
of course in which project or unit is used:
Environmental Technology for Interiors is a lecture and
discussion course and is part of a series of building technology courses.
The teaching approach for this course encourages independence, self-teaching,
critical thinking, and cooperative learning. Students are expected to
demonstrate their ability to recall facts, understand ideas, analyze,
synthesize, and evaluate information. Part of the information is presented
through lectures, field trips, and assigned readings, and part is gathered,
explored, evaluated and organized by students, individually and in teams.
Throughout the semester, students are encouraged to practice oral, reading
and writing skills, drafting, modeling and imaging in a variety of assignments.
- Prerequisite
information:
This course is offered in the Fall semester of the third year and requires
three Architectural Design Studios, Introduction to Architectural Interiors
(studio), History of Interiors I & II, Graphic Communications, Interior
Materials, Theory of Interior Design, Computer/3D Design, and Physics
as pre-requisites for enrollment.
- Content
covered in lecture or discussion:
The course covers traditional and advancing building technology systems
linked to interior design. Students learn about functional and environmental
aspects of building technology systems as they relate with peoples
well-being, indoor environmental quality, and global sustainability.
Students also examine the role of interior designers in improving the
quality of the global environment.
- The
specific topics addressed are: [see
Lecture Outlines]
Traditional and current notions of Shelter; Natural and Human-built
Environment; Global Sustainability; Indoor Environmental Quality;
Human Comfort; Ecological and Benign Design.
- Natural
systems: solar patterns, climate, radon, electro-magnetic fields,
living organisms, ecology, and human body functions.
- Building
Technology Systems: day lighting; concepts of thermodynamics; thermal
control; humidity control; natural and mechanical ventilation; air
conditioning and purification; sanitation; waste removal; water
and power distribution; alternative energy sources; acoustics; fire
and life safety; transportation; security; and telecommunication.
- General
information on building systems: history; characteristics and properties
of different types of systems; regional climatic and cultural differences
related to the use of building technologies; chemical and microbial
contamination; use of natural resources; manufacturing process;
testing, installation procedures and spatial requirements; related
research findings and conflicting evaluations; environmental and
safety concerns.
- Laws,
codes, regulations, standards, and practices that protect the health,
safety, and welfare of the public.
- Length
of course, units and projects:
The course is structured for one semester or 16 weeks. Students attend
three hours of classes per week, distributed in two days. Every four
weeks the one-hour lecture class is used for guidance on projects or
for evaluations.
Out of class time to complete the coursework varies from 3 to 6 hours
per week depending on the type or phase of the assignment. Students
are also required to participate in at least three field trips. These
take about an hour to prepare and the time spent in the site visit depends
on the location. In most cases, it takes one morning or afternoon (3
to 4 hours) per visit. The instructor only accompanies students in one
of the field trips. Each project requires 6-8 hours of teamwork.
The course content is divided into 15 units, each taking approximately
one week
Week 1: Environment and Life-support systems.
Week 2: Solar patterns, Design and Climate
Week 3: Day lighting
Week 4: Temperature and Humidity
Week 5: Ventilation
Week 6: Cooling
Week 7: Heating
Week 8: Benign Design
Week 9: Indoor Air Quality and Air Purification
Week 10: Water and Waste
Week 11: Power and Energy
Week 12: Fire and Life Safety
Week 13: Acoustics and electronic sound systems
Week 14: Security and Telecommunication
Week 15: Conveying Systems
Each unit encompasses specific readings and activities that take an
average of six hours per week to prepare and grade.
- Course
assignments:
Students
are expected to actively participate in class activities, work individually,
within groups, and with the instructor. Throughout the semester, students
are required to individually write an average of four reaction papers
consisting of 1 to 3 pages each and take four quizzes. In addition,
two team projects provide an opportunity for further development of
students communication skills.
The reading of provided texts is fundamental to achieve the necessary
understanding of the addressed subjects. The reaction papers provide
a base for class discussions and help the instructor in identifying
common misconceptions. Students are encouraged to write their reaction
papers by answering the following questions:
- Had
you thought about these issues before?
- Where
do you agree and disagree with this authors view?
- Do
you think professional designers should use this background in their
work? Why and why not? Do you have evidence that they are using
it?
- What
sort of design would result if using these concepts or not?
- In
what way you believe this information will affect your work or life?
Each
quiz covers the specific information of the previous four content
units. Quizzes consist of a set of objective questions that evaluate
individual learning of FIDER required topics and serve as a preparation
for future NCIDQ certification. Quiz questions are always based on
class notes provided for every lecture and posted in the class website.
[see Quiz Sample]
Team
project I examines a series of case studies on sustainable design
applications of environmental technologies. Teams prepare a Power
Point presentation [see
exemplars: Project 1] and orally present a case study that exemplifies
innovative use of technology systems to the class. Each presentation
takes about 15 minutes followed by a class discussion and a lecture.
Teams are expected to formulate questions for the class and to lead
the discussion. Teams consist of 3 to 4 students each.
Team
project II is a final paper/report consisting of at least 15 pages
and is due at the end of the semester. Teams develop the report comparing
all systems used for thermal comfort, water and energy conservation,
and waster reduction in three different approaches of residential
design - Solar, Energy Star, and Conventional. The project is based
on three specific field trips:
- On
the first field trip, the class is accompanied by the instructor
and visits a Solar House located at Interlachen, FL. The owner is
a Physics professor at the University of Florida who built the house
and can explain to students every feature that makes this unique
house self-sustained and independent from the utilities grid. Students
are encouraged to visit the Solar House web site [http://www.phys.ufl.edu/~liz/home.html]
before the visit and prepare questions to ask during the visit.
They are expected to sketch and take pictures, interview the owner
about the alternative environmental technologies observed, and the
familys life-style and believes.
- The
second and third field trips are a teams choice of both one
conventional residence and an Energy Star model home
located in new developments under construction in town or in the
vicinities. The teams visit the model homes, take pictures, and
do interviews with real state agents and/or builders to learn about
the energy saving building technologies (passive and active) and
materials specified.
Observation,
questioning, and photography of these buildings allow the examination,
comparison, and evaluation of several environmental technology systems
and their design implications. The final paper synthesizes field observations
and obtained information, comparing the use of alternative and conventional
environmental technologies, and materials in the three different types
of residential design. Students are encouraged to build an argument
with their own comments justifying their judgments with evidence found
in complementary literature and in the field observations. [see
exemplars: Project 2]
- Reading
Assignments:
REQUIRED
BOOKS
Binggelli, C. (2003) Building Systems For Interior Designers. New York,
NY: John Wiley.
Harmon, S. K. (2001) The Codes Guidebook for Interiors. New York, NY:
John Wiley.
ARTICLES
Baggs, S. & Baggs, J. (1996). Choosing a healthy location. The healthy
house (pp. 26-43).Sydney, Australia: Harper Collins.
Goodland, R. (1976). Buildings: environmental bonds or barriers? An
ecological perspective. In: Robert Goodland (Ed.) Buildings and the
environment (pp. 186-196). Millbrook, NY: The Cary Arboretum of the
NY Botanical Garden.
Guzowski, M. (2000). Daylighting for sustainable design. (Introduction;
Chapter 1. pp. xxiii 76).New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
Hawkes, D., McDonald, J., Steemers, K. (1995, May). Design for differing
climates. The Architects Journal. pp. 35-37.
McDonough, W. & Braungart, M. (1998, October). The next industrial
revolution. The Atlantic Monthly.
Pander, G. (2001, June). What if green design were just good design?
Dwell, pp. 86-87.
Pilatowicz, G. (1995). Part I: Environmental issue. Eco-interiors (pp.
9-31). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Snoonian, P.E. & Gould K. L. (2001, June) Architecture rediscovers
being green. Architectural Record, pp. 87-96.
Building-integrated photovoltaics: Putting power production where it
belongs. (2001, March). Environmental Building News, 10; (3). pp. 1,
8-14.
Building green
quietly: Noise pollution and what to do about it.
(2001, January). Environmental Building News, 10 (1). pp. 1, 9-14.
Daylighting: Energy and productivity benefits. (1999, September). Environmental
Building News, 8 (9). pp. , 10-13.
Daylighting part 2: Bringing daylight deeper into buildings.
(1999, October). Environmental Building News,. 8 (10). pp. 1, 10-14.
Energy Star programs: Uncle Sams partnership for energy efficiency.
(1998, June). Environmental Building News, 7 (6). pp. 1, 10-15.
Is solar still active? Water heating and other solar thermal applications.
(1999, July/August). Environmental Building News, 8 (7/8). pp. 1, 10-17.
Keeping pollutants out: Entryway design for green buildings. (2001,
October). Environmental Building News, 10 (10). pp. 1, 11-14.
Mold in buildings: What it is and how to keep it out. (2001, June).
Environmental Building News, 10.(6). pp. 1, 9-14.
Radiant-floor heating: when it does and doesnt make
sense. (2002, January). Environmental Building News, 11 (1). pp. 1,
9-14.
Radon & other soil gases: Dealing with the hazards from below. (1998,
July/August). Environmental Building News, 7 (7). pp. 1, 8-14.
Sustainability and building codes. (2001. September). Environmental
Building News, 10 (9). pp. 1, 8-15.
Thermal mass & R-value: Making sense of a confusing issue. (1998,
April). Environmental Building News, 7 (4). pp. 1, 12-14.
Students are strongly recommended to subscribe to one of the professional
journals such as Interiors and Sources, Dwell, and Environmental Building
News. Special articles are found in these periodicals and serve well
in supplementing information of a current nature
- Resources
Needed:
- Computer
with Internet, Photoshop and Power Point capabilities.
- Access
to a technical library.
- Ability
to participate in field trips.
- VCR
- Videos:
- Whats
happening with the weather? (2000) South Burlington, VT: WBBH
Boston Video.
- Environsense
(1993) Kennesaw, GA: Environsense Consortium, Inc.
- Controlling
Indoor Moisture (Date n/a) www.oikos.com
- Design
& Installation Guidelines for Non-Heat Recovery Whole House
Ventilation (Date n/a) www.oikos.com
- Evaluation
Criteria:
Grades
are based on assignments as well as on class participation. The following
areas are measured and evaluated:
- Understanding
of concepts and content information.
- Demonstration
of critical thinking, creativity, and organization skills.
- Demonstration
of effective use of graphic, written and oral communication skills.
- Demonstration
of attendance and active participation in class, team assignments,
and field trips.
Projects
and reaction papers are graded based on form and content: relevance
of the information gathered, organization of the material, visual
and/or verbal communication, demonstration of critical thinking and
creativity.
GRADING
Attendance and participation in class discussions: 10%
Participation in Field Trips: 10%
Reaction papers (individual): 15%
Case Study Presentation (team): 15%
Quizzes (individual): 20%
Final paper/report (team): 30%
- Exemplars
of student outcomes: [click
to see examples of student work]
- Bibliography:
AIA (1998) Environmental resource guide.
Allen, E. (1995) How buildings work. New York: Oxford University Press
Baggs, S. & Baggs, J. (1996) The healthy house. Sydney, Australia:
Harper Collins.
Ballast, D. K. (2002) Interior design reference manual: A guide to the
NCIDQ exam. Belmont, CA: Professional Publications.
Ballast, D. K. (1998) Interior construction & detailing for designers
and architects. Belmont, CA: Professional Publications.
Barnett, D. L. & Browning, W. D. (1995) A primer on sustainable
building. Snowmass, CO: Rocky Mountain Institute.
Berleant, A. (1992) The aesthetics of the environment. Philadelphia,
PA: Temple University Press.
Bower, J. (1993) Healthy house building: A design & construction
guide. Unionville, IN: The Healthy House Institute.
Brown, D. E. et al. (2000) Sustainable architecture white papers. New
York, NY: Earth Pledge Foundation.
Chiras, D. (2000) The natural house: A ccmplete guide to healthy, energy-efficient,
environmental homes. Vermont: Chelsea Green
Cowan, S. & Van Der Ryn, S. (1996) Ecological design. Washington,
DC: Island Press
Crowter, R. L. (1992) Ecologic architecture. Stoneham, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Drummond, W. et al. (1999) Life cycle costing guidelines for materials
and building systems for Floridas public educational facilities.
vol. 1 & 2. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Department of Education.
Environmental Building News (periodical)
Flynn, J. E. & Segil, A. W. (1970) Architectural interior systems:
lighting, air conditioning, acoustics. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Harmon, S. K. (2001) The codes guidebook for interiors. New York, NY:
John Wiley.
Harte, J. et al. (1991) Toxics a to z: A guide to everyday pollution
hazards. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Kempton, W.; Boster, J. S. & Hartley, J. A. (1995) Environmental
values in american culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lechner, N. (2001) Heating, cooling, lighting: design methods for architects.
New York, NY: John Wiley.
Mendler, S. & Odell, W. The HOK guidebook for sustainable design.
New York, NY: John Wiley.
Pearson, D. (1989) The natural house book. New York: Gaia Books.
Pilatowicz, G. (1995) Eco-interiors. New York, NY: John Wiley &
Sons.
Rousseau, D. & Wasley, J. (1997) Healthy by design. Vancouver: Harley
& Marks.
Rousseau, D.; Rea, W.J. & Enwright, J. (1988) Your home, your health,
& well-being. Berkeley: Ten Speed Press
Rousseau, D. & Wasley, J. (1997) Healthy by design. Vancouver: Harley
& Marks.
SBCCI - Standard building code (latest edition)
Tao, W. K. Y. & Janis, R. R. (2001) Mechanical and electrical systems
in buildings. Upper-Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Wells, M. (1981) Gentle architecture. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
Wilson, E. O. (1984) Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
|
|
 |